Interested in becoming our new flatmate? Then you’ll have to drop by our flatmate interview evening. Some students find rooms right away, others are rejected time and again.
Last week, student housing corporation DUWO announced that its policy on flatmate interviews is to be overhauled. This could affect many student residences. With over 33 thousand rooms in locations such as Amsterdam, Delft, Leiden and Wageningen, DUWO is one of the largest student housing corporations in the Netherlands.
DUWO thinks the system of flatmate interviews is unfair: “Students without a network, with less access to information or without a connection to certain associations are considerably less likely to get a room as a result.”
Freedom of choice
Begging to differ, a group of students from Leiden have launched a petition, which was signed 4,600 times in four days. They ask DUWO to “refrain from plans that limit residents’ autonomy and freedom of choice in selecting their future flatmates”.
But the policy change (or rather: announced policy change) doesn’t come out of the blue. The housing corporation has previously said it’s committed to “a fair home for all students”. And so, it will change direction from 2026 onwards.
From then on, DUWO wants to make its own pre-selection. This means residents will have to choose their new flatmate from the pre-selected candidates. This is to ensure “equal access and social cohesion”.
Elsewhere
Criticism of flatmate interviews isn’t unheard of. In Utrecht, student housing corporation SSH has abolished the interviews for new properties, instead operating on a ‘first come, first served’ basis. This, too, led to discussions.
A few years ago, a law student – who himself was chosen as a new flatmate right away – wrote in an opinion piece for Utrecht university platform DUB that flatmate interviews promote sexism and discrimination. He called for the complete abolition of the system of flatmate interviews.
Personal anecdote; I got my student accommodation only after I had already built up a few years of sign-up time; at that point, I had already been studying three years, so only the two years afterwards was in a DUWO home. Kind of unfair in comparison to people who were new students, but hey that was (is) the system
So if DUWO bases their pre-selection on built-up sign-up time for all student homes, then I doubt their measure will truly be fairer than the interview model.